There is an ongoing debate as to whether homosexuality is genetic or not. I do not know the answer. However going through literature, I found that there are very many things that have been blamed on genetics. One argument that I found interesting was on crime. Are people born criminals or are they made? See below the viewpoint of science students as reported in http://library.thinkquest.org/26750/main2.htm.

Genetics is the most argued point of criminology today. Some believe that genetics cause people to commit crimes. Research has been undertaken to find out if a certain chromosome combination will automatically make you a criminal or not. If this is true then you should be able to find out if your child will be a criminal even before they are born. Here are some outcomes of the geneticist and their lab studies :

One of the most used theories of why criminals commit crimes is that the person’s ability to commit crime is pre-determined. If that is so, then criminals have no choice over what they do. Some of the genetic abnormalities that would make someone pre-determined would be the XYY chromosomal structure (Not effective in women, just men). A chromosomal test in prisons had an outcome of 27Y, which means most of the prisoners had that many Y chromosomes. This is a chemical imbalance with its causes in genetics.

These theories have been tested on people in prison and have seem to have a high outcome. The “criminal disease” could be caused by a recessive gene passed down from one or both of the parents.

Does the Enviroment Control Crime?

If genetics doesn’t control crime what does? Most of the criminologists today still believe the same thing that was thought when we first started to look into crime. It’s the environment and nothing else. Genetics has no play, because if you are never introduced to a life of crime you won’t know what crime is, and will therefore not commit crime, but if you grow up in a house of crime, then you are going to commit crime due to the fact that all you know is crime.

So what do you think?

Even as we contemplate the effects of the Mututho bill, we thought you should know that:

According to interstingfacts.org, a hangover is a condition which is a result of the consumption of an excessively large amount of alcohol. But in reality a hangover is more like a withdrawal from alcohol for a short time period. A lot of experts state that some of the ingredients which are present in alcohol cause the hangover. The ingredients which are present in alcohol are known as congeners.

During the ancient times, people used a combination containing myrrh and the beaks of birds which had been grounded to a fine paste, in order to treat a hangover. But most people feel that a similar combination cannot be used in the modern times in order to treat a hangover. Liquor which is light like vodka and gin should be consumed instead of heavy and dark liquors like whiskey and brandy. All kinds of alcoholic beverages which contain chemicals should be avoided since they will cause a very sever hangover. The worst hangover will usually be caused by the consumption of red wine. A lot of people are also likely to become very angry and depressed after they have consumed a large amount of alcohol.

BestHangovercure.com on its part advices that while most hangovers disappear naturally after between eight and twenty-four hours, there are several remedies . These including drinking water to hydrate the body. Since alcohol causes the blood sugar to fall, foods that boost blood sugar are recommended. Foods that restore lost potassium and salts as well those containing fructose (which assists in burning the alcohol faster) would be helpful too.

Over the counter pain relievers can ease the unpleasantness but aspirin and Tylenol are to be avoided; aspirin irritates the stomach while Tylenol can cause liver damage. Taking more alcohol as a remedy is foolish since this only postpones the misery. Coffee is also not a good remedy since it is also a diuretic.

Prevention is always better than cure though. Before engaging in drinking alcohol one should take fatty foods to prevent the irritating effects alcohol has on the stomach. Milk also protects the stomach lining besides slowing the absorption of alcohol. Another preventive measures is taking water and non-fizzy soft drinks while imbibing to hydrate the body.

Now you know

2010 in review

Posted: January 3, 2011 by afyanet in Medical News
Tags: ,

The stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

Healthy blog!

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads Wow.

Crunchy numbers

Featured image

A Boeing 747-400 passenger jet can hold 416 passengers. This blog was viewed about 9,400 times in 2010. That’s about 23 full 747s.

 

In 2010, there were 12 new posts, growing the total archive of this blog to 38 posts. There were 14 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 543kb. That’s about a picture per month.

The busiest day of the year was November 8th with 442 views. The most popular post that day was All Crazy Weird X-rays.

Where did they come from?

The top referring sites in 2010 were mail.yahoo.com, facebook.com, en.wordpress.com, search.conduit.com, and WordPress Dashboard.

Some visitors came searching, mostly for placenta, nursing council of kenya, crazy x rays, weird x rays, and crazy x-rays.

Attractions in 2010

These are the posts and pages that got the most views in 2010.

1

All Crazy Weird X-rays May 2009
1 comment

2

Nursing Council of Kenya April 2009
66 comments

3

The Placenta Party March 2010
3 comments

4

Abortion in Kenya- The facts March 2010
18 comments

5

The Health Ambiguity April 2010
2 comments

Notes Pope’s Ability to See Small Steps of Impoverished Humanity

VATICAN CITY, NOV. 21, 2010 (Zenit.org).- A Vatican spokesman is clarifying that Benedict XVI is not justifying condom use, though the Pope said it could in some cases be a first step toward moral behavior. Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, director of the Vatican press office, said this in a statement today regarding the words of Benedict XVI as recorded in a book, “Light of the World” (Ignatius Press), scheduled for release on Tuesday.

On Saturday, L’Osservatore Romano published some quotes from this book, which drew public interest and media misunderstandings.

At the end of the tenth chapter of the book, the writer, German journalist Peter Seewald, asked the Pontiff two questions on the fight against AIDS and the use of condoms. Seewald referenced the Holy Father’s comments on this topic while aboard the papal plane on the way to Cameroon and Angola in March, 2009.

Father Lombardi noted that Benedict XVI answered Seewald by insisting “on the fact that focusing only on condoms is equivalent to banalizing sexuality, which loses its meaning as an expression of love between persons and becomes a ‘drug.’”

The spokesman affirmed that “fighting against banalization of sexuality is ‘part of the great effort to help sexuality be valued positively and have a positive effect on man in his totality.’”

He added, “In the light of this broad and profound vision of human sexuality and the contemporary discussion of it, the Pope reaffirms that naturally the Church does not consider condoms as the authentic and moral solution’ to the problem of AIDS.”

“In this the Pope does not reform or change the Church’s teaching, but re affirms it,” the priest stated.

“At the same time the Pope considers an exceptional circumstance in which the exercise of sexuality represents a real threat for the life of another,” the spokesman explained.

Recovering awareness

The Ignatius Press blog, Ignatius Insight, published these excerpts of the book today, noting the Pontiff’s words: “There may be a basis in the case of some individuals, as perhaps when a male prostitute uses a condom, where this can be a first step in the direction of a moralization, a first assumption of responsibility, on the way toward recovering an awareness that not everything is allowed and that one cannot do whatever one wants. But it is not really the way to deal with the evil of HIV infection. That can really lie only in a humanization of sexuality.”

When Seewald asked the Holy Father to clarify the Church’s position on the use of condoms, Benedict XVI responded: “She of course does not regard it as a real or moral solution, but, in this or that case, there can be nonetheless, in the intention of reducing the risk of infection, a first step in a movement toward a different way, a more human way, of living sexuality.”

Father Lombardi explained, “In that case, the Pope does not morally justify the disordered exercise of sexuality but maintains that the use of a condom to reduce the danger of infection may be ‘a first act of responsibility,’” as opposed to “not using it and exposing the other to risking his life.”

“In this, the reasoning of the Pope certainly cannot be defined as a revolutionary change,” he said.

“With courage Benedict XVI thus offers us an important contribution of clarification and reflection on a question that has long been debated,” the priest affirmed.

He continued, “It is an original contribution, because on one hand it maintains fidelity to moral principles and demonstrates lucidity in refuting an illusory path like that of the ‘confidence in condoms.’”

On the other hand, Father Lombardi said, “it manifests a comprehensive and far-seeing vision, attentive to uncovering the small steps — even if only initial and still confused — of an often spiritually and culturally impoverished humanity, toward a more human and responsible exercise of sexuality.”

He pointed out that in this book, “the Pope again clearly stresses” that when he spoke to journalists aboard the papal plane “he had not intended to take a position on the problem of condoms in general.”

Rather, the spokesman noted, the Pontiff “wanted to affirm with force that the problem of AIDS cannot be solved simply by distributing condoms, because much more needs to be done: prevention, education, help, counsel, being with people both to keep them from getting sick and in the case that they do get sick.”

With the recent legalization of Changaa and other traditional brews, we thought you should know that:

  • according to an answer in answers.yahoo.com, Ethanol  will not make you blind unless you drink so much that you get brain damage that ultimately causes you to go blind. Methanol or methyl alcohol which is the alcohol obtained from wood will cause blindness because it depletes the enzymes that work in the retina and therefore burning the nerves in the eye that then causes blindness.
  • A study  conducted by researchers from the American Cancer Society, the World Health Organization, and Oxford University, and that followed a group of 490,000 people over a nine-year period,   found that, compared to teetotalers, subjects who had a drink a day were 30 to 40 percent less likely to die of cardiovascular diseases. Their overall death rate was 20 percent lower.
  • At midnight on January 16, 1920 in the USA, the Eighteenth Amendment took effect that prohibited the manufacture, sale, transportation, import, or export of intoxicating liquor.  Intoxicating liqour was defined by the Volstead Act as any beverage containing more 0.5% alcohol. The law was in effect for 13 years.
  • One glass of white wine has 85 calories, a gin and tonic 140 and a pint of beer can contain up to 300 calories and that alcohol inhibits leptin, the hormone that promotes a feeling of fullness.
  • According to wikipedia, in 2006, the total global revenues from Beer alone were US$294.5 billion. If this money was to be distributed to the approximately 6 billion people alive then, each man, woman and child alive would have received approx Kshs 3,920 or Kshs 23,520 for a family of six!
  • That in the year 2000, 32% of fatal accidents in the USA were associated with drivers with a drinking history
  • According to Wikipedia,  the Chzeck Republic had the highest per capita consumption rate of beer in 2004 at 156.9 litres per person i.e. more than 300 half little bottles per person,  Kenya does not rank in the top 34

Thought you should know!

From the works of A-known-e-mass

(Terms of reference: (to be filled in by anyone wishing to read past this first paragraph) I ………. Do hereby swear that I shall not share this piece with the current or future employers of the writer, and that the writer reserves the right to deny that this is his work and that I ……………… will severally and jointly with all other readers, indemnify the writer from all and any liability that may befall him as a result of his publishing this work. <<include your phone number and mPesa pin number here>>)

Greetings good people. Its been a while since we last communicated and in case you missed me, then so did I you. Let me first begin by welcoming back my brain, it has been away on a long fruitful working holiday. The good thing is that my brain decided to go on holiday at or about the same time as the assignments in my office. I have therefore in the recent past had the opportunity to both be work free and in most cases brain free.

This recent period has however been a great learning experience. I have learnt a few things (imagine just how many more things I could have learnt if my brain had stayed with me the whole period rather than only paying a few ‘official visits’). It has also been a good period to interact and build bonds. I shall share a few things that I’ve learnt here but would also encourage those of you who may have been undergoing similar experiences to share them too. Sharing in this case need not be with someone else as among the things that I’ve learnt is that there are those who are perfectly capable of sharing only with themselves.

The first thing that I learnt is that when you are cruising or floating through life ‘brain free’, then you are in very good company. Good here means that you will encounter very many other adherents of this ‘brain free’ lifestyle. I was actually surprised to learn that there is a very big community of ‘brain freers’. Due to the rather frequent incidences of their brains being AWOL (away with official leave), this community has developed the unique ability to think with other parts of their bodies. There are those who have shifted their thinking processes to the stomach, others to their fists, a big number has preferred their mouths while yet a bigger group has opted to use that part of the body that is described as being above the knees but below the waist.

I also learnt that there is a group that have miraculously been able to redirect their thought processes to their wallets and purses. There are unconfirmed rumours that this ability is more likely to vest on people whose ancestry can be traced to the vicinity of some mountain. There were also rumours that there are those who are successfully thinking using their hearts while a very, and I mean very, small group is said to be using their souls. Those familiar with the ‘brain free’ community will know that rumours are in very high supply. Demand has however consistently outstripped this supply and more rumours are thus highly encouraged and sought.

The second thing that I learnt was that being idle is very hard work. You can imagine waking up and going to your usual place of work only to realise that the only relevant work you have for the day is logging in to your computer and shutting it. Now imagine that for more than seven hours, you have to not only appear to be busy but you also have to appear like you are busy doing something useful. Now further imagine that you have to do this while your brain is AWOL and while the office is full of both busy people and a people who are members of the ‘brain free’ community (if you can imagine all this then please note that you are idle).

Anyway, I have developed what I now recognise as critical skills for any employee or at least for any employee who though idle, need to appear to be working. These are skills that will see you promoted faster than you could have ever imagined. However, since my brain has since made a comeback and since I happen to be from the vicinity of a certain mountain, I shall not share these skills free of charge. Any interested persons are advised to ona mimi kando.

In the past few days, Kenyan have been left to wonder on what some terms mean, terms that we have all along thought as obvious and straight forward. These are terms that have been brought about by the abortion debate. We try here to give a few definitions of the terms ‘Health’ and ‘Health/Medical Practioner’, we however hope that those of us with more knowledge or information along this line will share with the rest of us.

Health

The definition according to the World Health Organization, the specialized agency of the United Nations that is concerned with human health on an international level is as follows

‘Health is a state of complete physical and social well being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. The enjoyment of the highest attainable standards of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition. The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is dependent upon the fullest cooperation of individuals and States.

The achievement of any State in the promotion and protection of health is of value to all’.

Health professional

We could not find the definitions of a health professional both from the WHO website or from the Kenyan Ministry of Health (site was down) or the current Kenyan constitution (this is however not to say that these bodies/documents do not have the definition, indeed we’d be glad if anyone with these information could share it with us here).  What we did find however, is that there are various organisations or associations which govern various professions in the Healthcare industry such as the The Kenya Medical Practitioners & Dentists Board which was established through an act of Parliament ‘to consolidate and amend the law to make provision for the registration of Medical practitioners and Dentists’.

However, we did come across the following definitions from various internet sources:

medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com

A Health Professional is defined as any person who has completed a course of study in a field of health, such as a registered nurse, physical therapist, or physician. The person is usually licensed by a government agency or certified by a professional organization.

Noun1.health professional – a person who helps in identifying or preventing or treating illness or disability

wikipedia.org

A health care provider or health professional is an organization or person who delivers proper health care in a systematic way professionally to any individual in need of health care services.

www.hpc.org

HPC  which is a regulator that was set up in the UK to keep a register of health professionals, recognises 15 health professions who according to them, ‘meet our standards for their training, professional skills, behaviour and health’. These are Arts therapists, biomedical scientists, chiropodists / podiatrists, clinical scientists, dietitians, hearing aid dispensers, occupational therapists, operating department practitioners, orthoptists, paramedics, physiotherapists, practitioner psychologists, prosthetists / orthotists, radiographers, speech and language therapists.

We have heard some suggest that watchmen in hospitals, mortuary attendants etc also qualify as health professionals. What do you think? (Please feel free to comment even where you feeling that hair stylists and matatu drivers are sufficiently involved in the business of healthcare provision to be considered Health professionals).

A few questions to our medical caregivers and caretakers;

  • Why does caregiver and caretaker mean the same thing?
  • Why is it that doctors call what they do practice?
  • Why isn’t there a special name for the tops of your feet?
  • Why do they sterilize the needle for lethal injections?
  • Why do doctors leave the room when you change? They’re going to see you naked anyway.
  • Do dentists go to other dentists or do they just do it themselves?
  • If a baby’s leg pops out at 11:59PM but his head doesn’t come out until 12:01, which day was he born on?
  • If a doctor suddenly had a heart attack while doing surgery, would the other doctors work on the doctor or the patient?
  • If laughter is the best medicine, who’s the idiot who said they ‘died laughing’?
  • If a guy that was about to die in the electric chair had a heart attack should they save him?
  • Why is it considered necessary to nail down the lid of a coffin?
  • If an ambulance is on its way to save someone, and it runs someone over, does it stop to help them?
  • Do you yawn in your sleep?
  • Do you wake up or open your eyes first?
  • When a pregnant lady has twins, is there 1 or 2 umbilical cords?
  • How old are you before it can be said you died of old age?
  • Do Roman paramedics refer to IV’s as “4′s”?
  • How important does a person have to be before they are considered assassinated instead of just murdered? And finally,
  • If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?

Kindly Post your answers below

The abortion issue has become one of the most discussed and contentious issues in the Constitutional debate. Though both sides of the debate- pro and anti abortion-  agree that there is a problem, there seems to be confusion as to a) what the problem is and b) what the solution is.

The pro- abortionist claim that there are too many women dying each day due to ‘unsafe’ abortions and that women need to have a choice about their bodies and health. The Pro-lifers counter that since life begins at conception, there are two lives at stake here both of which need protection and that legalising abortions will not necessarily make them ‘safe’ as it will neither increase the number of registered medical practitioners nor make the conditions any safer.

Both sides have used figures on the mortality rates and the number of abortions performed in Kenya per year to defend their position. What is strange however is the fact that no one seems to know where most of the quoted figures come from. Since most abortions are said to occur on so called ‘back street’ clinics and even at home, it would be interesting to know where these figures are sourced. Below are three different reports from various sources, have a look and have you say…

According to a report by Merlin which is a body that  has been operational in Kenya since 1998 and indicates that it currently works in three Provinces (Rift Valley, North Eastern and Nyanza) supporting the Ministry of health to strengthen its own capacity as well as respond to the needs of the community, the projected number of women with abortion complications admitted to public hospitals in Kenya is 20,893 per annum. An estimated 182 of these women die annually. The annual incidence of incomplete abortion and other abortion-related complications per 1000 women aged 15 to 49 years is projected to be 3.

According to the Federation of Women lawyers -Kenya (FIDA Kenya) in ‘A SHADOW REPORT TO THE 5TH AND 6TH COMBINED REPORT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA, ON THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN (CEDAW)’ and quoting research done by various organizations, 300,000 women die each year due to unsafe abortions. The report does not indicate the number if any of women who die as a result of ‘safe’ abortion’. It is also not clear whether the 300,000 figure is a Kenyan number or a global number, some people have however quoted it as a Kenyan figure.

According to an article published in PubMed Central by Fred Mbugua, a study of abortion in Kenya conducted jointly by the Ministry of Health, the Kenya Medical Association, and two non-governmental organisations, and which covered only 60 public hospitals, it was estimated that up to 800 unsafe abortions are performed every day in Kenya, leading to an average of 2600 deaths each year.

Will anyone with the real numbers please stand up!

Since Kenyans appear to have found a brand new use for the Placenta, we have done some research and here below is an article from the Hip-Chick-Pregnancy Guide on some other uses of the placenta.

Rituals and Uses of the Placenta After Birth

The placenta serves to nourish our babies before they are born, as well as forming a barrier to filter out substances that can be harmful to the unborn child. For the medical establishment, the placenta‘s job is done once birth has begun, and the organ that provided life for the child in the womb is to be discarded. However, for many cultures and some modern women, there are rituals surrounding the placenta that should be observed. These rituals vary, and can include consumption of all or part of the placenta, ceremonial burial of the organ, naming of the placenta, hanging it in a tree for consumption by scavengers, and making a print of the placenta as a reminder of its function.

Eating the Placenta

There is some anecdotal evidence that consumption of the placenta, either cooked, dried, or as part of a broth, can help prevent or ameliorate post partum depression. A number of cultures, including natives in Papua New Guinea and women in Vietnam and China prepare and consume the placenta, as do some animals, lending credence to this theory. Chemicals in the placenta may have the ability to repair some of the hormonal imbalances that occur due to childbirth, but they are probably not a complete remedy for all the effects that are referred to as PPD.

Burying the Placenta

Placenta burial is common among even more cultures. In a number of places, such as Kenya, Malaysia, and Nigeria, the placenta is considered the baby’s twin, or thought to have its own spirit, and is buried with the appropriate rites. In Mexico, Nepal, and New Zealand, the placenta is honored as the companion or friend of the baby, and is placed in the earth reverently, but is not thought to have a spirit of its own. Specific burial rites vary by culture, and in some, the placenta will be placed high up, such as in a tree, instead of being buried in the ground. In modern Western culture, placenta burial is usually highly personal. It may be based of off the rituals of other cultures, or on the perception of those rituals, but will probably be altered depending on the individual’s preference. It can be planted at the base of a tree or bush, for instance. Some mothers choose to get a special plant for each placenta they bury. Generally, if any time needs to elapse between the birth and the burial of the placenta, it is frozen until the time comes. Since the placenta is very nourishing, it will help the plant above it grow as it decomposes, returning to the earth. It may also be placed in its own container and buried with a marker.

Other Uses of the Placenta

Some people choose not to keep the placenta itself, or to engage in other rituals in addition to the burial or consumption of it. Making prints of the placenta, using either the blood that covers it or ink and paint, are not uncommon. Art done with a related substance – the amniotic membrane – has also been made. These are ways to have a keepsake of the pregnancy that reminds us of our connection with the earth. The placenta can be disposed of, buried, or consumed (provided no paint or ink was used) afterward, as the mother chooses.